• About
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Speaking
  • Events
  • Services
  • Contact

FatAlpha

Investing website that displays stock ideas, opinions and my strategies.

You are here: Home / Blog / Big Picture / Wall Street Arguments On Bitcoin Are Plain Wrong

Wall Street Arguments On Bitcoin Are Plain Wrong

December 5, 2017 By Sophocles Sophocleous

The Bitcoin mania continues as greed is part of human nature and grandmas to professionals get involved.  The professionals’ argument is that it’s not correlated to other asset classes and adds to diversification.  Former portfolio manager of the University of Chicago and current CIO of a crypto hedge fund, Ari Paul, thinks that endowments should look into crypto.  He is quoted in a Barron’s article as saying “If one allocates 1% of assets to crypto, for example, it will be additive to diversification, because it is absolutely uncorrelated to other asset classes.”
Ok, but sports betting is also not correlated.  Neither is the roulette table at Las Vegas or the horse track.  So the no correlation argument is simply stupid in my opinion.
Michael Novogratz who intends to start a $500 crypto fund believes that:
“This is a bubble and there is a lot of froth. This is going to be the biggest bubble of our lifetimes… But bubbles happen around things that change the world,”   His son’s friend’s mother called him wanting to put all her savings in bitcoin. “Not a good idea,” he said. “Maybe 5%.”

Don’t mix up Bitcoin with Blockchain technology. Blockchain could change the world.  Not Bitcoin.  Even if we were to accept the argument then it should be noted that the internet changed the world… but a lot of people lost a lot of money is something called the dot-com bubble…

The greed has led to the creation of futures contracts that will start trading this month.  Is it smart to start such an instrument just before the holidays?  Most seasoned traders would disagree.

Also, the mechanism to calculate the index (BRR) to which Bitcoin futures will be settled is not simple at all. As Kid Dymanite points out in his article “Let’s Talk About Arbitrage – Bitcoin Futures Edition“:

“To summarize, the BRR will be calculated by taking all of the trades on 4 different exchanges (Bitstamp, GDAX, itBit, and Kraken), calculating the VWAP (volume weighted average price) for 12 separate 5 minute periods, and then taking the arithmetic average of those 12 VWAPs.”

This complexity in an untested 2-way market is likely to be less efficient than people expect. Furthermore, while many expect the futures to reduce Bitcoin volatility and bring down the price, in the short term it could be an additional driver to push it even higher…

“just as $GLD enabled the masses to easily get gold exposure, which flowed through to the underlying price of gold and was a massive positive force for the gold market, synthetic BTC derivatives like BTC-F will, at least initially, result in speculators seeking long exposure from the product, which will result eventually in demand flowing through to the underlying BTC”

Can the Bitcoin bulls value Bitcoin?  It has no cash flows so what’s it worth?  As Vitaliy N. Katsenelson so eloquently put it in his article Bitcoin – Millenials Fake Gold “But Wall Street strategists have already figured out how to model and value this creature. Their models sound like this: “If only X percent of the global population buys Y amount of Bitcoin, then due to its scarcity it will be worth Z”.

Vitaliy reminds us that this is similar to the valuations during the dotcom bubbles.  Coke was clearly overvalued but “bulls used this math: “The average consumer of Coke in developed markets drinks 296 ounces of Coke a year. These markets represent only 20% of the global population.” And then the punchline: “Can you imagine what Coke’s sales would be if only X% of the rest of the world consumed 296 ounces of Coke a year?” Somehow, the rest of the world still doesn’t consume 296 ounces of Coke.”

I agree with Vitaliy 100%.  At the core, the investor should ask himself “Since I can’t value it, how would I feel if it drops 20%, 50%?”  Grandmas are buying bitcoins not because they believe in cryptos but because they are afraid of missing out.  It occurred in the 1600s with the tulipmania and its happening again today.  And of course, this doesn’t mean that Bitcoin can’t go higher.

But keep in mind that governments would never allow cryptos to replace fiat currencies.  As Vitaliy points out “… governments are very particular about their monopolistic right to control and print currencies – this is how they can overpromise and underdeliver. No less important, the anonymity of cryptocurrencies makes them a heaven for tax avoiders – governments don’t like that.”

The Chinese government imposed a nationwide ban on cryptocurrency exchanges and while there is news that they may be allowed, “[they] shall adopt ‘0-tolerance policies’ towards crimes hidden underneath and take measures such as record-keeping, licensing, AML processes, real-name, limiting large transactions.” Doesn’t sound in-line with what Bitcoin supporters want…

Keep in mind that a ban on cryptos can happen anywhere.  In 1933, the U.S. President made it illegal to “hoard gold coin, gold bullion, or gold certificates.”  People were required to deliver all but small amounts of gold to the Federal Reserve in exchange for $20.67 (Wikipedia).

But these are not the only reasons one shouldn’t invest in Bitcoin.  Evergreen Gavekal agrees with Vitaliy and gave four additional reasons in a must-read post (link):  Bitcoin is extremely volatile, Bitcoin doesn’t behave like a currency, Bitcoin isn’t backed (also an argument made by Vitaliy), Bitcoin is extremely expensive.

So people thinking about investing in Bitcoin should consider the above.  The fact that it can’t be valued, is not backed by anything and regulation could wipe out its value at any point in time should be enough for any investor to turn away.  Gamblers… well… good luck…

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Reddit
  • WhatsApp
  • Pocket
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed Under: Big Picture, Blog

Free Insights & Substack

Charlie Munger quotes

"Acknowledging what you don't know is the dawning of wisdom."

Events

Disclaimer

fatalpha.com is not operated by a broker, a dealer, a registered investment adviser, or a regulated entity. Under no circumstances does any information posted represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. In no event shall fatalpha.com, Sophocles Sophocleous, FATALPHA LTD, or any affiliates or associates be liable to any member or guest for any damages of any kind arising out of the use of any content available on the website. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance. All the information on this site and any related materials is not intended to be, nor does it constitute investment advice or recommendations. All materials and information you obtain here are exclusively for informational purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation to provide any investment services to investors based in the U.S. or elsewhere.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy

Recent Posts

  • 7+ Stock Ideas
  • ASSA with Pon Van Compernolle
  • ASML: The picks and shovels of chips
  • 1st FatAlpha Value (Asia)
  • Does Buffett like beer more than Coke?

Disclaimer

fatalpha.com is not operated by a broker, a dealer, a registered investment adviser, or a regulated entity. Under no circumstances does any information posted represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. In no event shall fatalpha.com, Sophocles Sophocleous, FATALPHA LTD, or any affiliates or associates be liable to any member or guest for any damages of any kind arising out of the use of any content available on the website. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance. All the information on this site and any related materials is not intended to be, nor does it constitute investment advice or recommendations. All materials and information you obtain here are exclusively for informational purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation to provide any investment services to investors based in the U.S. or elsewhere.

Search

Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Disclaimer |  Archive

Sophocles Sophocleous

A Fulbright scholar and Chartered Financial Analyst, has been active in the global financial markets since 1999. This website displays his personal thoughts and views. Read More…

Copyright © 2025 · FatAlpha · All rights reserved

*** Free Insights ***
Free stock ideas
Videos of idea discussions
Free substack included Unsubscribe any time
By subscribing, you give us permission to send you our monthly letter. We will NOT be in contact with you in any other way. You can change your mind at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of any email you receive from us, or by contacting us at info@fatalpha.com. We will treat your information with respect. For more information about our privacy practices please visit our website. By providing your email and subscribing, you agree that we may process your information in accordance with these terms. We use MailChimp as our marketing automation platform. By clicking below to submit this form, you acknowledge that the information you provide will be transferred to MailChimp for processing in accordance with their Privacy Policy and Terms.
%d